I though I would take a break and post something else that really gets me.
We all know that piracy has ended up as a monumental PR mess for the record industry, and it is a undisputed fact that the industry in general were far too late and couldn't adopt the same model they do in the shops so invented DRM (lets not go any further into this)
I love music as much as the next man, but when a consumer thinks their being ripped of they will always find a new way, the internet provides such a way. So when Napster and Kazaa came along the consumers went there instead of going to the local music store, by the time the industry realised just how big this was they had only one option left to sue everything and everybody related to this P2P software. As a resulting pissing off there next generation customers and the ones they already had, and along the way giving themselves and P2P developers bad press.
I have been doing plenty of writing about AI and Artilects but have yet to explain what AI really is/what I thing AI really is.
Artificial intelligence (also known as machine intelligence and often abbreviated as AI) is intelligence exhibited by any manufactured (i.e. ) system. The term is often applied to general purpose computers and also in the field of scientific investigation into the theory and practical application of AI. Wiki
While this definition is valid I think it is far too compliated, AI is quite simply a program that learns nothing more nothing less. So what is learning exactly. Continue reading →
Artilect: Artificial intelligence (also known as machine intelligence and often abbreviated as AI) is intelligence exhibited by any manufactured (i.e. ) system. The term is often applied to general purpose computers and also in the field of scientific investigation into the theory and practical application of AI. Wikipedia
An Article that dropped into my feed reader at the beginning of the week, describes a system devised by Hitatchi which monitors the person haemoglobin levels in the Brain (Optical Typography) The use of this is very limited now but could have a large impact on the way we intereface with technology but also for people who are paralysed, a clear example of converging technologies. Continue reading →
Tweaks have been made to the site, there are now links to allow you to easily subscribe with Bloglines, or Google Reader or just the plain old feed at the bottom of each post, and the have been some minor cosmetic tweaks to the sidebar.
This is something that falls squarely with in my field of "God that is cool/interesting" Catergory, but before I launch into some meaningful post, I may be helpful to have a bit of background information.
Artificial brain designer and theoretical physicist ~Prof. Hugo de Garis raised the issue of whether humanity should build godlike intelligent machines. Because of technological advances, he foresees a time in this century when artificial intelligence can be developed at the atomic level, and an object the size of an apple could surpass human brain capacity to the trillionth power.
At this point, he believes humanity will break into two groups. The Cosmists, who want to build these massively intelligent machines, and the Terrans who are against it. A third, smaller faction, he labeled as the Cyborgists, who want to merge with the artificial intelligence. Prof. de Garis believes the conflict between the Cosmists and the Terrans will be so extreme that wars could be fought over the issue.
The machines he called "artilects", may become so massively intelligent, said de Garis, that they would regard humanity, in the same way we look at insects, and they could be so powerful as to create their own universes. He boiled it down to the question: Do we build gods or do we build our potential exterminators? In an on-the-spot Fast Blast poll that was conducted, 56% sided with the Terrans, and 44% with the Cosmists.
What a subject, and one subject to heated debate on both sides. but lets forget who started there photocopiers first and look at what makes Mac OS X better than Windows and more specifically Vista.
So both OSes are good at what they are meant to do;manage hardware resources, its all a OS has to do and they both do it well, but on-top of that there's the nice pretty glass(aero/aqua if you prefer) on-top and then the applications themselves, the stuff we all use.
So Windows has VB and its various implementations of C for your coding no real clear cut way of making a program for people like me (beginner) but VB is extremely simple to get your foot through the door. So what about Mac OSX while theres Automator & Applescript and there's Xcode and all that encompasses: cocoa and carbon. This is what makes the Mac much better from a users perspective and quite possibly a developers perspective also, there's a clearly defined way to code and make the program, Apple has created extensive frameworks to code for and into, theres no complicated way of making your own chances are there already in the OS. An example of this would be creating a zip, typically on windows you would get winzip and zip up the file, with Mac OSX and Quicksilver a few key presses launch up the framework and compress the file to whatever you want.
So what makes it better, the simplicity of making extensible programs without the program being sick with DLLs and files on the Hard Disk, only one OS gives this seamlessly without hassle and you guessed it's the Mac.